Question: What would
happen if solar and wind energy collecting devices got the same tax breaks as
the fossil fuel industry? "The impact of fossil
fuels on renewable energy development, described in this section, may be broken
down in to four key aspects, though there is some overlap between these. First,
fossil-fuel subsidies impair the relative cost competitiveness of renewable
energy by reducing the cost of fossil-fuel-based alternatives. Second, since
many electricity systems are based on fossil-fuel generation, fossil-fuel
subsidies often act to lock in and reinforce incumbent generation technologies,
thereby imposing entry barriers for new entrants attempting to develop
renewable technologies. Third, a shift to an electricity system including a
greater role for renewable energy requires investment, which is undermined by
fossil-fuel subsidies that appear to enhance the attractiveness of fossil-fuel
technologies compared to renewable energy. Finally, the underpricing
of environmental and social externalities means that prices do not reflect the
true cost of energy." "The Impact of
Fossil-Fuel Subsidies on Renewable Electricity Generation"December 2014 Richard Bridle
and Lucy Kitson http://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/impact-fossil-fuel-subsidies-renewable-electricity-generation.pdf
I think the last key
aspect needs more clarity on costs and price because the underwriting of solar
and wind energy collecting devices by fossil fuels might add more costs to the
devices if the environmental and social externalities were factored in. This
added cost would need to be added to the price of the devices.Just as important, they would be factored
into the making of the devices if a total system assessment was taken. This
would mean at least challenging the green description and probably the
sustainable and renewable description.
If you decide to transfer resources and energy to solar and
wind energy capturing devices then ”own what you are doing.”The “sustainable”, “green”, “renewable”
descriptions associated with these devices are not true.
From a very narrow perspective these devices can be called
those attributes.However, if the view
is expanded to the energy streams and the natural resource streams and coupled
with the global industrial complex that underwrites these devices the picture changes
to a dynamic flow of large machines, complex processes, huge installations for
refining and manufacturing.
There are economies of scale that dictate how large these
business complexes (float glass manufacturing) must be to allow commercial
access. These economies of scale structure the costs as well as the scope of
environmental impact.I am suggesting
that if you use and/or promote these solar and wind energy capturing devices - own
and conceptualize what you are using.If
you see it as a transition – is it temporary or continuous?Whichever, how do you produce the next
generation of devices? In addition, how
will you produce the products you want to use with the electricity?I suggest if you are using these devices and
promoting them as future energy answer: I suggest the renewable and sustainable
questions above need to be answer.
These “solutions” are business as usual.Can the earth or the next generation of
people take more business as usual?
Glass is a wonderful product.Float glass for windows (along with screens)
improves homes and other buildings enormously.Think about what your home would be without glass.So this is not an essay against glass.It isn’t even an essay against using glass
for solar energy collecting devices whether they are for heating hot air, hot
water or making electricity.
It is important to understand the components of the energy
collecting devices so we don’t designate them with false labels such as green,
renewable or sustainable.
The process to get glass is to find silica deposits, dig them up, crush
them, move them to the factory, powder them in a ball mill, then put the
powdered material through the production line.Here is some of the process and equipment.This is big, expensive and energy intensive
equipment.
THIS IS A FOUR MINUTE FILM THAT WALKS YOU THROUGH
THE MAKING OF FLOAT GLASS FROM MINE TO FINISH PRODUCT
Float
Glass Manufacturing Process .flv4
minutes
SOME FACTS ABOUT FLOAT GLASS
Energy Use
CARBON DIOXIDE
Did you know?
Float glass plants are enormous – over 350,000 square feet under each
roof.
Each plant uses $500,000 of natural gas and $85,000 of electricity every
month.
Plants run 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
Each FG plant ships 35-40 trucks of glass every day, at almost 35,000
square feet per truck.
Glass is cut in sizes as small as 16″ x 20″ to as large as 130″ x 204.”
http://www.cardinalcorp.com/products/float-glass/
“The global
market for flat glass in 2010 was approximately 52 million tons. (value of
around 22 billion euros at the primary level and about 55 billion Euros at the
level of secondary processing, therefore a total business of about 77 billion
Euros). 70 % of tonnage is consumed in windows for buildings, 10 % in glazing
products for automotive and 20 % in furniture and other interior applications.
Europe, China and North America together account for over 70 per cent of global
demand for flat glass. Europe is the most mature glass market and has the
highest proportion of value-added products. Four companies; NSG Group,
Saint-Gobain, Asahi and Guardian, are fully global. 52 million tons of glass
for a global population of 6.8 billion habitants means that average consumption
is 7.6 kg per person and per year with extreme usage being Europe with almost
20 kg per person and per year and India with about 1 kg per person and per
year. The flat glass business represents 0.1% to 0.2% of the GPD [Gross
Domestic Product], in average.”
“The world flat glass industry. Focus on history & economy”. Bernard Jean
Savaëtehttp://www.glassonweb.com/articles/article/772/
SOLAR LOW IRON GLASS
“As of 2009, the solar
industries demand for flat glass accounted for 0.7% of all glass produced; we
projected that this increased to 1.5% in 2010.”
Global energy glass consumption
in 2012 will be 1.1% of total market
Here are the possible
projections for the need for solar low iron glass.Note that the most optimistic projections crosses
the current flat glass capacity around 2020.
So with BUSINESS AS USUAL
and solar glass only being a small percentage of total glass manufactured, the
projections on the chart above mean the need for massive manufacturing
development globally.
“To double the flat-glass
capacity will require building 192 new float plants, each with a 1000 ton per
day capacity, at an expense of 27 - 36 billion dollars (in today’s value). To
increase output to ten times current capacity will require building an
additional 1523 float glass plants for a capital investment of 245-327 billion
dollars. i.e., almost twenty times the value of the current annual flat-glass
market.”
Silica sands contain a higher
proportion of silica (up to 99% SiO2) in the form of quartz and are employed
for applications apart from as construction aggregates. They may be developed
from each loosely consolidated sand deposits and by crushing weakly cemented
sandstones. In contrast to construction sands, that are made use of for their
physical properties alone, silica sands are valued for any mixture of chemical
and physical properties. These contain a high silica content material inside
the form of quartz and, far more importantly, low levels of deleterious
impurities, particularly clay, iron oxides and refractory minerals, like
chromite.
Ball mill is an efficient tool for grinding
many materials into fine powder. -
http://www.unisbm.com/solution/stone/small-scale-ball-mill-for-quartz-crushing-258.html
THE PRODUCTION LINES ARE HUGE AND HOT
HERE ARE SOME OF THE PRODUCTION LINE
HEATS
http://durashieldmarine.com/glass-manufacturin/
Each of the plant’s six batches of
dry ingredients weighs 5,700 pounds, with some consisting of sand with iron it
and some without it. The materials are placed in the mixer, squared and blended
with both a little moisture to avoid dust issues and cullet to help the sand
burn quicker. The move allows the glassmaker to avoid wasting glass, while also
lowering the company’s power consumption by limiting the heat necessary to melt
the sand.
As it is, the plant is good for
six-figure power and seven-figure gas bills each month.
Once completely batched, the sand is transposed into a
furnace that reaches 2,950 degrees Fahrenheit. The heat is so great that the
temperature of the room in the warehouse that houses the furnace feels like 162
degrees. Employees working in that area are constantly told to hydrate, but
usually carry several changes of clothes each day as they sweat profusely.