Saturday, November 24, 2012
Hothouse Update
The decision to use the photovoltaics was because I already had them. I needed to buy a deep cycle battery and some controller/diverter electronics. I think this will give the next generation to use our farm a leg up. I had solar panels at my old place that had been up 22 years when I sold the place. They appeared to be putting out the same amount of electricity as the day I installed them. The weak link is the batteries and then the electronics.
Yes, there is a sense of being a hypocrite given my feelings about "renewables" simply being an extension of the fossil fuel stream. However, given my feelings about fracking, tar sands, and deep ocean drilling, I am being hypocritical every time I drive, rototill and blow snow. And so much more. Damn.
We plan to use this set up at the hothouse/greenhouse to pump water using a 1/2 hp 12 volt motor on our pumpjack,
for 12 volt grow lights, and
when the batteries are full the load will switch to a 12 volt heater in the drying cabinet.
See also: http://sunweber.blogspot.com/2012/10/our-hothousegreenhouse.html
Monday, October 22, 2012
Our hothouse/greenhouse
It is a grand experiment and a steeeep learning curve.




Inside we have the drying cabinet beneath the chimney. Here it is with shelves and closed. On the one side is a small opening that will allow air directly from the room to enter. Not built yet is the duct that will connect the solar panel to the drying cabinet. The duct will have a door that either allows air to flow into the drying cabinet or allow the heated air to flow into the room. The scaffolding allows us to work comfortably at the drying cabinet. It will be used for other purposes as we learn. (The color of the walls is white but the light off the green wood acts strange?)

Sunday, September 2, 2012
Suck it up.
This has been on many of the mailing lists about energy, resources and climate that I follow:
“The latest from Guy McPherson... is his saddest yet
30. August 2012
http://guymcpherson.com/
In my latest essay in this space I mentioned two phenomena worth fighting for: the living planet and freedom based in anarchy. I surrender. I no longer believe the struggle matters on either front. I no longer think we’ll save the remaining shards of the living planet beyond another human generation. We’ll destroy every — [...]”
Others echoed this position. This is my response.
We can grieve our potential demise as a species. We may cause it. Species come and go. Mortality is a bitch.
But living isn't. It is great joy.
I play cribbage with the senior citizens in my town. At 69, I am the youngest. One of their sayings, "You want some cheese with that whine."
Two of my local friends are farmers. They are both in their 80s. They just stopped milking this year. He has been legally blind since early childhood. Has a rope strung to the barn. I rototill their garden so she can grow their food. They still will cut hay because in is their way. They revel in living.
Because of stupidity, I have emphysema and hardened lungs from radiation that saved me from cancer. When I work, I will often and episodically have to been over to catch my breath. I don't stop working, I revel in it.
We, my partner and I, are building a growing system with rotational fields, trees, berry bushes, large root cellar, new hot house for growing and drying food. Wells that can be worked with human power all for the next generation. We have one young man working with us. We had some 20 somethings visit this summer and they want to come back and volunteer (we will see). I am planting trees and bushes the odds are I may not see come to fruition. If it goes to hell, there is not a damn thing I can do about it. I love the learning, the creating, the work.
We will continue our population stupidity, it is the nature of the beast (all life).
We will continue gorging ourselves on the resource of the earth because it is the nature of the beast (all life).
We will continue to play the us and them game because we are a social animal, we need to belong, we need to have answers no matter how absurd for a sense of control and we will find scapegoats among the "them" because it is the nature of this particular beast.
We will continue to have unintended consequences arising from our acts seemingly well intended and innocuous, again it is the nature of this particular "too smart for our own good" beast.
We will continue to have inequity in power/resource availability whenever we become larger than the gatherer and hunter group size (30 to 200) that we evolve into and lived with for 99% of our existence. Life does not give out the candy of brain and/or brawn fairly. It is the nature of how things shake things out.
I have lived at an incredible time in human history. So many opportunities. So much to enjoy. I am alive because of high tech medicine. I thrive at the knowledge available to me to learn about so much and celebrate the men and women who have contributed to that knowing.
I know I have done it on the backs of others and on the back of "mother" earth. We in the USofA (and much of the west and the rich everywhere else) have benefitted from the rape of others lands, from military incursion when it will be good for business, assassination when necessary and so many other atrocities.
Now it is coming home to roost.
Suck it up.
John Weber
Curmudgeon of Northern Minnesota
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Willful Blindness, Willful Hypocrisy, You first. What’s your spin?
From Margaret Heffernan’s Willful Blindness:
“People are highly driven to do things that build self-worth; you can’t transgress and think of yourself as bad. You need to protect your sense of yourself as good. And so people transform harmful practices into worthy ones, by coming up with social justification, by distancing themselves with euphemisms, by ignoring the long-term consequences of their actions. “
Heffernan, Margaret. 2011. Willful Blindness: Why We Ignore the Obvious at Our Peril. Walker. N.Y. pg. 195.
This is something that I have known for a long time. Here is a quote from my journal written when I was around twelve years of age. It is from a book on psychology but I don’t know which. I started reading psychology books at eleven – Freud, Havelock Ellis, Kraft-Ebing, Jung, etc. Yes, I have always been strange. I didn’t know to copy references at that age.
“We build up a picture of ourselves; hence, we come to expect certain things from ourselves, to value ourselves and to do everything possible to keep this idealized picture of ourselves unspoiled.”
The social protective is our very human need to belong. The essence of being human is being a social animal. We must learn the rules of our particular game early – language, emotional display, right, wrong, and most importantly how to belong. We carry this early training (shaping) with us our whole life. Without it we do not survive physically or psychologically.
“As the pioneering psychopharmacologist Jaak Panksepp put it, ‘social affect and social bonding are in some fundamental neurochemical sense opioid addictions.’ In other words, our desire to seek social connection with others comes from chemical rewards as well as social ones.”
Heffernan, Margaret. 2011. Willful Blindness: Why We Ignore the Obvious at Our Peril. Walker. N.Y. pg. 132.
Endorphins: Endorphins ("endogenous morphine") are endogenous opioid peptides that function as neurotransmitters.[1] They are produced by the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus in vertebrates during exercise,[2] excitement, pain, consumption of spicy food, love and orgasm,[3][4] and they resemble the opiates in their abilities to produce analgesia and a feeling of well-being.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endorphin
. . . the general argument is that we deceive ourselves the better to deceive others. To fool others, we may be tempted to reorganize information internally in all sorts of improbable ways and to do so largely unconsciously. . . . the primary function of self-deception is offensive – measured as the ability to fool others.
Trivers, Robert. 2011. The Folly of Fools. Basic Books. N.Y.
Here is the point of this. There is lots of information about the convergence of serious problems. There is lots of information – books, articles, internet, meetings – on these problems and the solutions.
“. . . A lot of people think we were facing our last century as a viable civilization, maybe even as a species. Global warming, overpopulation, the death of he seas, the loss of arable land, the proliferation of disease, the threat of nuclear or biological warfare . . .”
“We might have destroyed ourselves but at least it would have been our own fault.”
“Would it, though? Whose fault exactly? Yours? Mine? No, it would have been the result of several billion humn beings making relatively innocuous choices: to have kids, drive a car to work, keep their job, solve the short-term problems first. When you reach the point at which even the most trivial acts are punishable by the death of the species, then obviously, obviously, you’re at a critical juncture, a different kin of point of no return.”
Wilson, Robert Charles. 2005. Spin. Tom Doherty Associates Book. N.Y. pg.127-128.
In essence few if any of us are really doing a damn thing about it. We all have our spin.
From the Energy Round Table – a quote from the moderator and in italics a poster:
"Hitting the gas pedal decades ago is not something that
I think anyone who understood the problem would have
done. Why would anyone with half a brain make a plan
that severely damaged the biosphere of the planet that
their descendants would have to live (or die) on??"
Bill Tamblyn – Moderator
If we don't use all the water, someone else will.
If we don't use the oil, someone else will.
If we don't burn the coal, someone else will.
If we don't spread GMO crops, someone else will.
If we don't make more babies, someone else will.
If we don't waste the biosphere, someone else will.
If hitting the oil or coal or baby or gas pedal
gets me ahead or more status, then I must do it.
Was this a plan or lots of little plans?
More likely we just can't help ourselves?
Does tragedy of the commons fit here?
Arlen Comfort
My partner in answer to using a banana each day at breakfast and buying strawberries grown a thousand miles away said, “But I don’t buy roses.” Friends, who I love dearly and who are very environmentally and energy conscious, have a business totally dependent on driving to supply it and tourism for its success. They modified their distribution paths and feel they have made a significant change.
WHAT IS YOUR SPIN?
Let’s be clear. Every mile we drive supports fracking, tar sands, pollution of the oceans, underground water, rivers, the air, and our food. Each meeting we attend to save the earth from whatever surely makes us feel good. Each thing we write, each time we talk about this, we are playing the Transactional Analysis game – “Ain’t it Awful?”.
Each of the maybe billion of us at the top of the energy/resource heap are rushing towards the cliff. I do not to excuse myself from the spinning. This from one of my other essays:
I am polluting our ground water by using the natural gas from fracking. I am creating havoc in the oceans by spilling life-killing oil. I am also plasticizing the oceans. I am also limiting or eliminating species after species in the ocean, on the land, in the air. I am putting my medicines into the rivers and the water supply. I am greedily creating food sources that only I control. I am removing the topsoil. I am gouging huge holes in the earth. I am burning coal and creating nuclear waste for thousands of years to come for my flat screen television, my computer and my DVD player. I am putting mercury and acids into the air, water and life. I am melting the ice caps and the glaciers. I am heating the planet to drive my snowmobile, my wave runner, and my four-wheeler and to drive to any damn place I want. I am using many people to cater to my many whims.
I saw the DVD “What a Way to Go” yesterday. It was very well done in listing the freight train laden with our woes coming straight at us. The many speakers continually said, “we are doing this” and “we are doing that”. They must have been talking about me. Because I am aware of these things and more and I keep doing it.
http://sunweber.blogspot.com/2011/05/just-say-i.html
John Weber
Busy in Northern Minnesota doing all these things and more.
So enjoy while you can. I am.
Some internet sources:
http://climateandenergynews.zparking.net/
http://www.energybulletin.net/
My site: http://sunweber.blogspot.com/
http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/
Abelson, Robert P. 2004. Experiments with people : revelations from social psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum. Mahwah, N.J.
Bayne, Tim and Fernández.Jordi, editors. 2009. Delusion and self-deception : affective and motivational influences on belief formation. Psychology Press. New York.
Berne, Eric. 1964. Games people play : the psychology of human relationships. Grove Press. New York.
Berners-Lee. Mike. 2011. How Bad Are Bananas?: The Carbon Footprint of Everything. Greystone. Vancouver.
Cumpsty. John S. 1991. Religion as Belonging. University Press of America. N.Y.
Fonseca, Eduardo Giannetti da. 2000. Lies we live by : the art of self-deception. St. Martin’s Press. New York.
Gianetti, Eduardo. 1997. Lies We Live By: The Art of Self-Deception. Bloomsbury. N.Y.
Hirstein, William. 2005. Brain fiction : self-deception and the riddle of confabulation. MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass.
Keyes, Ralph. 2004. The Post-truth Era. St. Martin’s Press. N.Y.
Kurzban, Robert. 2010. Why everybody (else) is a hypocrite. Princeton.
Lockard, Joan S. and Paulhus, Delroy L. Editors. 1988. Self-Deception: An Adaptive Mechanism. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
Mele, Alfred R. 2001. Self-deception unmasked. Princeton University Press. Princeton, N.J.
Triandis, Harry Charalambos. 2009. Fooling ourselves : self-deception in politics, religion, and terrorism. Praeger Publishers. Westport, Conn.
Twerski, Abraham J. 1997. Addictive thinking : understanding self-deception. Hazelden. Center City, MN.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depersonalization_disorder
“. . . The farther removed we become from our neighbors, the more siloed in our self-sufficiency, the easier it is to treat people as things, to turn a blind eye to the human costs of toxic cultures and to make immoral decisions.
LIES
Credibility gap
Reframing
Terminological inexactitudes (Winston Churchill’s)
Poetic truth
Parallel truth
Nuanced truth
Imaginative truth
Virtual truth
Alternative reality
Strategic misrepresentations
Creative enhancement
Nonfull disclosure
Selective disclosure
Augmented reality
Nearly true
Almost true
Counterfactural statements
Fact-based information
TO LIE
Enrich the truth
Enhance the truth
Embroider the truth
Massage the truth
Tamper with the truth
Tell more than the truth
Bend the truth
Soften the truth
Shade the truth
Shave the truth
Stretch the truth
Stray from the truth
Withhold the truth
Tell the truth improved
Present the truth in a favorable perspective
Make things clearer than the truth
Be lenient with honesty
Spin
Keyes, Ralph. 2004. The Post-truth Era. St. Martin’s Press. N.Y. pg.15-16.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Our New Greenhouse
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Nuclear Power
Hello,
I read your SunWeb blog. What are your thoughts on nuclear power, including fusion and fission power?
As for fusion, it has been ten years away - for decades. The best place for fusion is on the sun and the best way to use it is photosynthesis and passive solar. In other words, the sun provides energy through plant foods, animal foods, animal power, wood, some biomass, windmills (non electric) and well-designed structures.
There are four major reasons that I don’t support nuclear fission power now or in our future.
The first is simply, nuclear fission would not exist without fossil fuels. I mean the research, experimentation, testing, construction, maintenance, storage and decommissioning. It is an extension of the fossil fuel supply system. Both the economy and fossil fuel energy availability and cost will challenge present reactors. Without fossil fuels, nuclear power stations will not be built and will represent a serious danger over and above the danger the waste currently presents.
DNA India 2012-03-13: Eighty percent of the world's nuclear power plants are more than 20 years old, raising safety concerns, a draft UN report says a year after Japan's Fukushima disaster. Many operators have begun programmes, or expressed their intention, to run reactors beyond their planned design lifetimes, said the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) document which has not yet been made public. "There are growing expectations that older nuclear reactors should meet enhanced safety objectives, closer to that of... more »
http://article.wn.com/view/2012/03/13/Older_nuclear_plants_pose_safety_challenge_IAEA/
The danger of waste is the second reason. The thousands of years required to allow some of the waste to become non-toxic requires a stability in the world of which history shows no evidence.
Nuclear power is seen by nuclear utilities and congress as such a risk that:
The Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act (commonly called the Price-Anderson Act) is a United States federal law, first passed in 1957 and since renewed several times, which governs liability-related issues for all non-military nuclear facilities constructed in the United States before 2026. The main purpose of the Act is to partially indemnify the nuclear industry against liability claims arising from nuclear incidents while still ensuring compensation coverage for the general public. The Act establishes a no fault insurance-type system in which the first approximately $12.6 billion (as of 2011) is industry-funded as described in the Act. Any claims above the $12.6 billion would be covered by a Congressional mandate to retroactively increa
se nuclear utility liability or would be covered by the federal government. At the time of the Act's passing, it was considered necessary as an incentive for the private production of nuclear power — this was because electric utilities viewed the available liability coverage (only $60 million) as inadequate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price–Anderson_Nuclear_Industries_Indemnity_Act
Nuclear operators are not liable for the entire costs of their own nuclear accidents, and the financial burden for this risk is inappropriately transferred to taxpayers. Since corporations under Price- Anderson are only responsible for around two percent of the estimated cost of a serious accident, nuclear power corporations can largely ignore (from a financial perspective) the dangers that reactors impose on American communities.
www.citizen.org/documents/Price-Anderson-Factsheet.pdf
The story of the Price-Anderson Act
: how Congress made nuclear power financially viable in the U.S. by eliminating accountability for risk.
Chernobyl and Fukushima speak for themselves as the third reason. They are the Black Swans (Nassim Nicholas Taleb) we can perhaps imagine, but not predict. One was direct human error; one was natural catastrophe with of course indirect human error. How many more? These are some of the unintended consequences of nuclear.
Each of the above are premium and primary reasons why I do not support nuclear power; however, there is a fourth that is truly my main reason. We humans, as a group and as most individuals, are not smart enough, wise enough, moral enough or mature enough to handle such power. All technology carries with it the unintended consequences mentioned above. We rush blindly into technological innovation because it will make life “easier”, it will immensely benefit some economically and we simply can not predict the complex effects.
Dillworth, Craig. 2010. Too Smart for Our Own Good. Cambridge Univ. London.
McCorriston, J. & Hole, F. 1991. “The Ecology of Seasonal Stress and Origins of Agriculture in the Near East.” American Anthropologist. V. 93. p. 46-49.
There is also the continued tendency of power technologies to be more centralized, demanding more draconian control measures and creating a dependency that makes humans beholden to the power distribution brokers. I find this an unhealthy trend.
Our human tendency of creating US-against-THEM thinking to strengthen our sense of identity and belonging adds a dangerous component to all potential technologies of such intrinsic power.
Eller, Jack. 2006. Violence and Culture. Thomson. Canada.
Eller, Jack David. 2010. Cruel Creed, Virtuous Violence. Prometheus. N.Y.
Avalos, Hector. 2005. Fighting Words. Prometheus. New York.
Berreby, David. 2005. Us and them : understanding your tribal mind. New York : Little, Brown and Co.
Cumpsty, John. 1991. Religion As Belonging. University Press of America. N.Y.
Docker, John. 2008. The Origins of Violence: Religion, History and Genocide. University of New South Wales.
Kiernan, Ben. 2007. Blood and Soil: A World History of Genocide and Extermination from Sparta to Darfur. Yale Univ. New Haven.
Rozenblit, Bruce. 2008. Us against them : how tribalism affects the way we think. Kansas City, MO : Transcendent Publications.
Volkan, Vamik. 2004. Blind Trust. Pitchstone. Virginia.
Wellman, James. 2007. Belief and Bloodshed. Rowman and Little. N.Y.
Wentz, Richard. 1993. Why People Do Bad Things in the Name of Religion. Mercer University Press. Georgia.
It is clear to me sustainability is a living process and a process of living. Nuclear does not fit this process.
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
I was born in Deland, Florida, on April 7, 1943. I grew up in Hialeah, Florida. During the fourth grade I was in a
combined fourth and fifth grade class.
I participated in both so was advanced directly to the sixth grade. At the age of eight I started a lawn
mowing business that was year round in Florida. By the time I graduated from Miami Jackson High School I had
worked at various jobs including movie usher, at a fast food drive-in and
summers loading trucks in a warehouse. Along with keeping up with my studies and the
working, at the age of 13 I made Eagle Scout, one of only four in the United
States to accomplish this at that age.In November of 2015, I went into the hospital for an operation on my lungs. The first one didn't take and they had to repeat within a week. I laid on my back for the month of November with two huge tubes coming out of my back. Then I was totally bed ridden for December and January. Finally I am coming around to much more activity. I am on oxygen 24/7 but have gotten the gardens rototilled and lots of other work done. This is the second time I have had to fight back. Whew.








